# Cinemachine license

**URL:** https://discussions.unity.com/t/cinemachine-license/929428
**Category:** Cinemachine
**Tags:** Question
**Created:** [September 18, 2023, 2:25pm UTC](https://discussions.unity.com/t/cinemachine-license/929428 "2023-09-18T14:25:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aer0ace](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/unity/user_avatar/discussions.unity.com/aer0ace/32/556384_2.png) [@aer0ace](https://discussions.unity.com/u/aer0ace)
#### Post date: [September 18, 2023, 2:25pm UTC](https://discussions.unity.com/t/cinemachine-license/929428/1 "2023-09-18T14:25:36Z")

</div>

In light of the recent Unity news, I’ve been evaluating the components of my project that are in questionable porting status.

Cinemachine is open source, but I can’t find the actual license anywhere.  
I see numerous forks of Cinemachine.

Besides the obvious technical changes that are required to adapt Cinemachine to another engine, would the license stop me from using Cinemachine in a project outside of Unity?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gregoryl](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/unity/user_avatar/discussions.unity.com/gregoryl/32/101869_2.png) [@Gregoryl](https://discussions.unity.com/u/Gregoryl)
#### Post date: [September 18, 2023, 2:35pm UTC](https://discussions.unity.com/t/cinemachine-license/929428/2 "2023-09-18T14:35:00Z")

</div>

I am not a lawyer, but my gut feeling is that you can’t use Cinemachine outside of a Unity context.

We are all (including Unity employees) eagerly waiting for more updates from Unity management. I wouldn’t take action just yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![aer0ace](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/unity/user_avatar/discussions.unity.com/aer0ace/32/556384_2.png) [@aer0ace](https://discussions.unity.com/u/aer0ace)
#### Post date: [September 18, 2023, 2:41pm UTC](https://discussions.unity.com/t/cinemachine-license/929428/3 "2023-09-18T14:41:13Z")

</div>

Thanks for your response. I understand things are up in the air right now. I’m just evaluating my options, which will take a while to estimate involved work. It’s possible the other options are really not in my favor anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![antoinecharton](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/unity/user_avatar/discussions.unity.com/antoinecharton/32/98149_2.png) [@antoinecharton](https://discussions.unity.com/u/antoinecharton)
#### Post date: [September 18, 2023, 5:34pm UTC](https://discussions.unity.com/t/cinemachine-license/929428/4 "2023-09-18T17:34:53Z")

</div>

[Cinemachine](https://github.com/Unity-Technologies/com.unity.cinemachine/blob/main/com.unity.cinemachine/LICENSE.md) is under the [Unity Companion licence.](https://unity.com/legal/licenses/unity-companion-license) The part 1 is probably what you are looking for.
