Difference between AlphaTest and Transparent RenderQueue?

Graphics Shaders & Materials
1

I am using a depth mask path on one of my transparent materials to avoid order related artifacts. The shader works as expected when I select the AlphaTest RenderQueue but it doesn’t work at all when using the Transparent RenderQueue. Do you know why? What happens to materials in the Transparent RenderQueue?

Here you can see what I mean:

Here’s a basic outline of my shader:

Shader "World/Glass"
{
    Properties { /* some properties here*/ }

    SubShader
    {
        Tags
        {
           "Queue"      = "AlphaTest"
           "RenderType" = "Transparent"
        }

        Pass
        {
            ColorMask 0
        }

        Pass
        {
            Name "BASE"

            ZWrite Off
            Blend SrcAlpha OneMinusSrcAlpha

            Tags
            {
                "LightMode" = "Always"
            }

            CGPROGRAM
            /* some simple shader stuff here */
            ENDCG
        }
    }
}

I can give you the complete code, if you want but trust me, it’s nothing fancy.

2

AlphaTest is an opaque queue, like Geometry, Background, and any queue 0 through 2500. Opaque queues are rendered in front to back order.

Transparent is a, well, transparent queue, along with Overlay and all queues after 2500. Transparent queues are sorted back to front.

Front to back sorting means the objects closest to the camera are rendered first with objects far away rendering last. This is done actually specifically for the reason your shader is working like you expect, which is ZTest is rejecting pixels where the depth has already been written to.

Back to front sorting is as you can likely guess there opposite with objects furthest from the camera rendered first and objects closest to the camera rendered last. This is because it’s expected that these objects will not have the benefit of the depth buffer for sorting and can be seen through each other so you don’t want ZTest rejecting pixels anyway.

So in you’re case you have transparent objects but you want them to sort and depth reject like opaque, so you’ll need to use AlphaTest, or a queue up to 2500, for it to sort in a way that works for how you want. Alternatively you could use two shaders in different queues to do the depth write and the color, or you could manually resort using renderer.sortingOrder.

6 Likes
3

Thank you again but I don’t know. There is something I still don’t understand or there is something we are both missing. I admit that I didn’t know that even the opaque render queues are sorted but even then shouldn’t it still work as I expected? Imagine two separate transparent walls crossing each other. Unity has to draw one of these walls first, no matter if sorted back to front or front to back, so the back of one of these walls should be visible through the other wall no matter which render queue I am using, right? But this is what I get:


In case the image doesn’t show up: http://fs5.directupload.net/images/170301/z8chi4sx.gif

How is that possible by just sorting differently?

4

Unity’s sorting doesn’t always sort how you expect due to batching, bounds calculations, and some other Unity oddness. I would suggest you look at the scene using the frame debugger to see exactly what order it’s rendering stuff in the scene. I think it’ll become much more obvious once you step through and see it update.

5

Thanks for the hint to use the frame debugger. I never used it before to be honest. I finally managed to find the source for my transparency problem.

The AlphaTest queue draws all the depth mask passes first and then all the corresponding base passes. The Transparent queue, however, draws the depth mask for one object and immediately after that its corresponding base pass. After that the next depth mask pass is rendered and again its corresponding base pass and so forth…

So the transparent render queue consumes all passes of one object first before going to the next one! O_O This makes a depth mask pass useless in that queue. How is one supposed to know that?

1 Like
6

This post saved me, thank you BrightBit!

2 Likes