Hello!

Quick question, more like a curiosity.

From a performance point of view, is it better to use a *larger* *for* rather than 2 nested *fors* ? I assume the difference in performance is negligible anyway.

For example (nested for):

```
for (int i = 0; i < m_groups.Length; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < m_groups*.coins.Length; j++)*
```

*// stuff here*

*(and larger for)*

*for (int j = 0; j < m_positions.Length; j++)*

*// stuff here, but m_positions.Length = all m_groups.coins.Length*

*Thank you!*