[HELP] Platform corner detection not working with rotation

[Resyuk]

I’m trying to detect the top corners of a platform from where the player is looking. I did this with a raycast being shot forward from the character. It perfectly works with platforms that have a Y rotation of 0, however, if the platform is rotated to any certain degree, the position of the marker is totally off.

video example:

https://vimeo.com/798519061

Thank you for your time.

[Kurt-Dekker]

Photographs of code are not a thing. If you post a code snippet, ALWAYS USE CODE TAGS:

How to use code tags: Using code tags properly

You’re always going to have a rough time with physics if you assign transform position directly, as you do above.

With Physics (or Physics2D), never manipulate the Transform directly. If you manipulate the Transform directly, you are bypassing the physics system and you can reasonably expect glitching and missed collisions and other physics mayhem.

Always use the .MovePosition() and .MoveRotation() methods on the Rigidbody (or Rigidbody2D) instance in order to move or rotate things. Doing this keeps the physics system informed about what is going on.

Collisions in high speed without unity physic / rigidbody

You say you're not using 2D physics but you're using queries therefore obviously colliders. This IS using 2D physics therefore you need to use it correctly so here are some basic rules: Don't ever modify the Transform if using 2D physics components If you want a 2D Collider to move then add a Rigidbody2D and use its API to move it; many ways to do this. Rigidbody2D don't make it "unresponsive". If you want explicit control then set the body-type to Kinematic; it's what it's for. When you qu…

OnCollisionEnter2D not being called

That’s not related to body-type. You should never drive via the Transform. The main thing to understand here is that the Rigidbody2D role is to write to the Transform after the physics simulation, not the other way around. It acts as a proxy to the Transform because you want physics behaviour. Does “it work” if you write to the Transform and force the Rigidbody2D to read from the Transform? Yes! It works like that because otherwise it’d be reported as a bug and so we’re forced to “support” it.…

[Resyuk]

@Kurt-Dekker

Photographs of code are not a thing. If you post a code snippet, ALWAYS USE CODE TAGS:

How to use code tags: https://discussions.unity.com/t/481379

You’re always going to have a rough time with physics if you assign transform position directly, as you do above.

With Physics (or Physics2D), never manipulate the Transform directly. If you manipulate the Transform directly, you are bypassing the physics system and you can reasonably expect glitching and missed collisions and other physics mayhem.

Always use the .MovePosition() and .MoveRotation() methods on the Rigidbody (or Rigidbody2D) instance in order to move or rotate things. Doing this keeps the physics system informed about what is going on.

https://discussions.unity.com/t/866410/5

https://discussions.unity.com/t/878046/8

I’ll take the code tag in consideration, in other regards, I’m not using a RigidBody on the player.

[Kurt-Dekker]

Then I would suspect the error is somewhere near the first lines which seem to take the hit position and than “do things” with it, things related to the local position and local scale of the Transform within the hit object.

Generally it’s better to put invisible GameObjects into your “things” so that you don’t have to do crazy rotational 3D math at runtime but rather simply grab the requisite Transform and use it directly.

You must find a way to get the information you need in order to reason about what the problem is.

Once you understand what the problem is, you may begin to reason about a solution to the problem.

What is often happening in these cases is one of the following:

• the code you think is executing is not actually executing at all
• the code is executing far EARLIER or LATER than you think
• the code is executing far LESS OFTEN than you think
• the code is executing far MORE OFTEN than you think
• the code is executing on another GameObject than you think it is
• you’re getting an error or warning and you haven’t noticed it in the console window

To help gain more insight into your problem, I recommend liberally sprinkling Debug.Log() statements through your code to display information in realtime.

Doing this should help you answer these types of questions:

• is this code even running? which parts are running? how often does it run? what order does it run in?
• what are the values of the variables involved? Are they initialized? Are the values reasonable?
• are you meeting ALL the requirements to receive callbacks such as triggers / colliders (review the documentation)

Knowing this information will help you reason about the behavior you are seeing.

You can also supply a second argument to Debug.Log() and when you click the message, it will highlight the object in scene, such as Debug.Log("Problem!",this);

If your problem would benefit from in-scene or in-game visualization, Debug.DrawRay() or Debug.DrawLine() can help you visualize things like rays (used in raycasting) or distances.

You can also call Debug.Break() to pause the Editor when certain interesting pieces of code run, and then study the scene manually, looking for all the parts, where they are, what scripts are on them, etc.

You can also call GameObject.CreatePrimitive() to emplace debug-marker-ish objects in the scene at runtime.

You could also just display various important quantities in UI Text elements to watch them change as you play the game.

If you are running a mobile device you can also view the console output. Google for how on your particular mobile target, such as this answer or iOS: How To - Capturing Device Logs on iOS or this answer for Android: How To - Capturing Device Logs on Android

If you are working in VR, it might be useful to make your on onscreen log output, or integrate one from the asset store, so you can see what is happening as you operate your software.

Another useful approach is to temporarily strip out everything besides what is necessary to prove your issue. This can simplify and isolate compounding effects of other items in your scene or prefab.

Here’s an example of putting in a laser-focused Debug.Log() and how that can save you a TON of time wallowing around speculating what might be going wrong:

Coroutine missing hint and error

This is so unnecessary. Use the beauty and power of instantly and immediately putting a Debug.Log() statement into the very start of the coroutine, right at the top. Do this always at the very first sign of trouble or question in your mind. The instant you did this you would see “Oh man, this code is simply not getting run!” And you could LASER-FOCUS 100% your efforts on studying what you expect to run it, eg., the call location, and isolate why it is not running. You would look at literall…

When in doubt, print it out!™

Note: the print() function is an alias for Debug.Log() provided by the MonoBehaviour class.