You’re making some very inaccurate statements of who takes drugs and why they take them there, the rich and famous are a tiny niche of what is an enormous ‘industry’ spanning every class and culture on earth and is prevalent absolutely everywhere to a degree you may not be aware of. Peaches dying, Amy Winehouse dying, high profile drug related deaths of a very particular type of celebrity, not representative of drug users in the main whatsoever. You’ll be amazed to know pretty much any person takes them and generally it makes absolutely no difference to their lives. They go to work they play sports they watch tv with their family they are you and me and everyone else on earth. Most people who take recreational drugs are perfectly normal people. Normal people are generally smart enough not to broadcast they take drugs loudly around those who do not understand that the fact they take drugs makes absolutely no difference to their life other than they feel pleasant by artificial means more regularly than those who don’t take drugs. You don’t think people around you are high because a normal person acts completely normally, because they know its stupid to act high around people who don’t understand, and typically you dont walk around town off your face unless its 4am and you just got out of a club, and you dont look like youre high unless you’ve been particularly strenuous about being high for a few hours (club the typical example). Plus every drug is different, d you drink cigarettes? Do you smoke beer?
I don’t think drug use would go down, but it wouldnt necessarily go up either, and wether it went up or down the fact remains the vast majority of drug users will be completely normal people doing completely normal things most of their lives, professionals and labourers, people from all walks of life, being completely capable of functioning like anyone else. It’s like saying everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic. Ive met more alcoholics than people addicted to illegal drugs, and ive met more people devastated by alcohol than illegal drugs. More people die from alcohol related deaths than any other social-associated chemicals, even by proportion, and its not even like it’s a tiny elite of people who do this. Ten years ago a million ecstacy tablets were taken every weekend in this country alone. Now it is an even more massive market and the problems caused by its criminality are increasing. The deaths behind the drug (And i’m not advocating it’s use, im not a fan of that one either although ive had my little journey with it) including the famous Leah Betts case were mainly caused by lack of education, chemicals other than the drug expected being present in whatever form they consumed it, or they were also, believe it or not, and its not mentioned very loudly cause you know, most adults do it, drinking alcohol, and it was typically the alcohol that brought the problems on.
You’ll find it interesting that there is legislature for new chemicals to be researched and if found potentially dangerous, banned, over a relatively short trial period. They havent banned alcohol yet, or cigarettes. Governmental decision makers don’t tend to talk about alcohol related fatalities over the course of a year, or the cost alcohol has on health and social services. The most deadly drugs available are also the legal ones. So you either have to present a really good case for why these legal substances should remain legal over a vast amount of statistically proven healthier alternatives, in terms of mortality rates and hospital admittances, or face the basic hypocrisy of arbitrarily making one chemical illegal over another, and you have to investigate why some things are being allowed despite being absolutely deadly (There’s still quite a high chance either of us could die of lung cancer despite having quit now, ive read the book you’re talking about btw, its very good, the man completely understands the smoking mentality to the finest detail, its almost impossible to smoke having read the book because the man absolutely knows what hes talking about and hes absolutely right). They’re not still legal out of humanitarian kindness, there’s one really obvious reason they’re legal and its the same reason the illegal ones were initially made illegal, and continue to be kept illegal, can poke around in american history for all that but the easy explanation is that some people need to get paid and they’ll create a problem they get paid to fix if they have to.
Your comment about the swiss was apt. They might have said the same thing on being offered cocaine. You never really know. They’re everywhere (drug users, not the swiss, or maybe the swiss too)