Windows only, though…
http://www.silo3d.com/forum/showthread.php?p=55797#post55797
Looks like an interesting modeller, but to put aside Blender, I need FBX export w/ skeletal animation, which Silo doesn’t have, unless I’m missing something. Nor does Cheetah, nor Modo, etc… Character animation is my big question now. I did the Dim3 Inspire thing, it’s barely workable, and painful to use. I guess Wings or Milkshape are options on Windows, but that feels like going backwards. If full fbx or collada support doesn’t come to Blender/Unity soon, I’ll be forced into Maya. And then I’ll have to have Motion Builder, too…sigh… And then they will repo my car, and my wife will divorce me.
If you don’t mind using Windows, check out Softimage XSI Foundation. I picked it up for only $369 at Safe Harbor (competitive upgrade).
or lightwave. it’s more than xsif but runs on a mac with full fbx (w/plug in)… or just be patient. i’m sure blender will work soon. it moves pretty fast.
Wings is available for OSX, but that won’t help you with your animation, it’s a 3D modeler / UV mapper only, no animation.
Keep your fingers crossed, there may be yet another alternative for character animation and .FBX output. I’m on the beta team for Carrara and what you’re looking for -may- be in the next version. Otherwise, Blender (or Lightwave) are your best hopes.
I’m giving Cinema 4D a spin at the moment. I like it much more than Maya, but it’s mucho expensive…
I’m currently working on character animation support for Cheetah3D. Including full “take” support in FBX files.
So maybe Cheetah3D will become an option then. 
Bye,
Martin
Wow, great news Martin - I’m actually a registered cheetah 3 owner; I’m looking forward to the v4 beta!
Thats excellent news, Martin.
Thats great Martin. I always figured C3D and Unity Indy could be the perfect match for indy developers. You guys should offer package deals or something once you got animation support working!! Jeff
I agree -Cheetah has caught my eye. I have access to Maya at the moment and its great, but ultimately I will need a licensed modeller/animation app. Martin I look forward to trying the download of Cheetah 3d. Having heaps of tutorial/video tut examples is key, I think. Even better would be sending a dvd out when people buy a license, so those like me on dialup internet can get up to speed. And its awesome to see a developer so involved with our forum.
When I first started using unity I was struggling due to A: not understanding the scripting side of things, and B: there was not enough “easy” tutorials, but with the regular updates and new tutorials, I feel like I’m actually getting somewhere, So thanks Unity crew, its made a Major difference. Looking forward to FPS3 tut.
AC
Hi,
I’m happy to hear that there is some interest. 
By the way does Unity import the morph targets (KFbxShape) from FBX files? Since I will also support them.
Bye,
Martin
well you’d have a sale from me that’s for sure (and i’d suspect many more in the future from other Unity users as well). i notice you don’t support blender files directly - are you going to include blender support or can you reliably get blender models into cheetah through other formats?
AFAIK, Blender does not export animation (meshmorphing, probably) to external file formats. Of course, .blend files contain everything, but that is basically a binary dump of the blender scene, with some headers describing how its laid out. It’s practically impossible to get this right - even if you read the source.
Btw, it’s the same method employed by Unity
Blender file format support isn’t planed for Cheetah3D because it is no easy job to load them correctly. I also think the time is better invested in a solid FBX support. Especially since almost all 3D apps support FBX nowadays. Even Microsoft is pushing FBX. So FBX is becoming more and more the standard exchange file format for 3D data.
Bye,
Martin
Hi Martin and others,
Perhaps you could consider Collada support (in theory Collada support will come for free with FBX support but i don’t think it is implemented yet). The FBX API is not GPL compatible and thus Blender can’t link to it and there is no FBX format specification.
Collada is supported by all major 3D applications including Blender, and is rapidly being supported in game engines, including Ogre 3D and the major commercial engines (don’t recall which ones have already announced support…).
nicholas,
I think there are 4 or 5 formats that Blender exporters export animation. Probably the best implemented/most complete is the Ogre 3d exporter which can be found at Ogre 3d.
Something of interest to game developers is that the next Blender release (1 1/2 to 3 months from now) will support high polycount multiresolution sculpting (zbrush like) - you can download testing builds now (search for sculpting at blenderartists.org), hard edges, retopology (similar to silos but we have a few nice additional things such as ellipse and grid patterns) (retopology is in the sculpting build, hard edges are in the modifier testing builds), likely lightmap baking, multi uv maps, and a few other things to make game devs happy.
LetterRip
that would be awesome, and if blender collada / fbx gets decent animation export sometime soon that would allow me to use my pennies on unity pro!
great news, thanks for the heads-up ; )
cool news tom! glad to see you round these parts!
Hi,
I’m actually waiting for that but I have doubts that it will ever happen. Alias announced Collada support almost 12 months ago and nothing happened. I have the feeling they lost their interest, which doesn’t surprise me to much. What I’ve seen so far does the data structures of Collada and FBX don’t fit to well together. A loss-less conversion could be quite complicated if possible at all.
You also have to consider that Discreet announced that FBX will be the main data exchange format for Maya to 3DMax and vice versa.
I nevertheless have the feeling that Collada came to late to make the race. Collada is also by far not as easy to support than FBX. But that is just my opinion.
Bye,
Martin
Hello again,
the first attempt at Collada support (it was for Collada 1.3) got off to a rough start and the initial developer has left. However a new developer joined and is making good progress with 1.4.
Collada 1.4 support is now progressing quickly with animation support being funded by a dutch equivalent to Googles summer of code.
See this thread for details,
http://forum.unity3d.com/viewtopic.php?t=2739
Native Collada support is coming to most tools simply because it is Sony PS3s native format, but also end users want an open interchange format.
FBX support for Blender would be difficult, since the GPL and the FBX SDK license are incompatible. (It could be done by wrapping the SDK as an external library which is then called by a python script, which can all be distributed seperately from Blender).
It makes sense for them to do so, they control the format and it supports all the data they need. Also it is a binary format so saving and loading will be faster. They limit what the SDK exposes so only they can completely support the format.
From a lock in perspective it makes perfect sense for them to want to stick with FBX - of course it is bizarre that other tool developers to want to support it except as a temporary solution.
LetterRip
I wonder how OTEE is supporting Collada if not through the FBX plugin? They have said before somewhere on here they want to keep one code path for models to keep things sane.
-Jon