I really love unity; and wants it to be better than any other engines.
I want to know that why unity is weak at the point of graphics than unreal.
You have to be specific. Some graphical features might be better.
There is no lumen or nanite (yet?) but Unity themselves have a different focus (I don’t always fully agree, but they seem to be going in the right direction)
1 Like
Unity’s HDRP can produce the same graphic quality (excluding lumen/nanite) as Unreal. Unity is doing just fine, and when they release Unity 6, youll see what i mean…
2 Likes
Unity’s largest source of income isn’t high end games.
3 Likes
These were my points on which Unity must work.–
Enhanced Rendering Pipeline
Improved Material Editor
Optimised Performance
High-Quality Asset Store
Visual Scripting Enhancements
1 Like
There are working on those, maybe not so much visual scripting
I don’t see a real advantage for most of these. Unity’s Universal pipeline is the most popular pipeline followed by their High Definition pipeline. By that reasoning we need a lighter one not a heavier one which falls inline with the optimized performance.
IMO visual scripting is pointless for Unity. For UE it’s a must have since C++ is much more difficult to get started with than C#, but C# is a joke in terms of difficulty and if you’re developing a really high end game you shouldn’t have any trouble with C#.
Cool, that just says you’ve either just started or haven’t paid any attention to how they’ve screwed over most of their customers lately. Regardless of that though if the above list is “must have” then you’ve chosen the wrong engine. At the end of the day an engine is just a tool. Don’t fall in love with it. You’ll just get burned.
1 Like
Your list of “must-have’s” doesnt fit Unity, you chose the wrong engine. If your looking for that list to fit, use Unreal Engine, but if your as new as i think you are, then welcome to your dev journey, its going to be a very long one, lol.
1 Like
Excuse me?
3 Likes