Hello everyone !
I’m working a bit on some VFX, and when building basic particle effects, I’m wondering whether I should always go for VFX graph (provided there is no need for collision) no matter how few the particles, or if there’s a cost to it that makes it bad for simpler systems…
Cheers !
Hi @VincentAbert ,
Currently the built-in Particle System has less of an overhead when instantiated multiple times, so if you want to have many instances of small effects, it might be the better option at the moment.
That being said, you can also use the VFX Graph as a master effect orchestrating all the smaller effects, meaning you can have one large VFX Graph effect and via script sent events to trigger particles of that effect at the desired position with any optional parameters (different color, velocity, etc.)
An example of this is explained with the optimization of the shooting system in the FPS Sample project documented in this blog.
Hope this helps!
10 Likes
I looked into this some months ago, to decide whether it made sense to keep my existing shuriken particle systems for lower end hardware:
.
The main result was that Shuriken can definitely outperform VFX graphs in cases where the player doesn’t have a good GPU. I ended up implementing a toggle in my game to allow players to switch between using VFX or Shuriken for particles. That’s a fair bit of extra work, but I found that having some simple shuriken systems for low-end hardware performed better than using VFX graph in those cases.
5 Likes
As a described at Unity Blog , Particle System is better in compatibility of its physics with game object’s physics and reading back its result.
Moreover, we could do very complex simulation in Particle System with UnityEngine.ParticleSystemJobs.
2 Likes
When you say “at the moment”, do you mean that there will be less of an overhead for VFX Graphs in the near future possibly? Thanks.
1 Like
Yes we plan on optimizing CPU usage and scalability with lots of VFX components by adding “VFX instancing” in 2021
5 Likes
What about persistant effect, such as missile/thruster flame, which need to be synced transform in local space. Does vfx have a better (or worse) performance of maintaining/interating (not only instantiate) through many small effects?
Is there any progress on VFX instancing?
VFX instancing is currently being actively developped. However target version is 2022 not 2021 as I stated in my previous message
3 Likes
Hi @JulienF_Unity Can we expect VFX Instancing to support mobile android devices like Oculus Quest 2, or will it be limited to high end graphics?
To that end, is Particle System the system of choice to use when developing for Quest 2 or should we be looking into switching over to VFX graph for future projects?
3 Likes
Bump. What is the status of the quest 2 support`?
2 Likes