This Ludiq background worker, I don’t know what it does that makes it choke, but apparently it requires more power than training an AI model, it’s so f-ing ridiculous than no matter how powerful a workstation I grab, this shit tier visual scripting engine will just burn the CPU to a smoking ember. C…

[image] svenneve: It is unusable on large code base projects that are actively being worked in. This is the correct takeaway. They never should’ve integrated current version of the tool and then call it production ready for some checkbox of having VS in Unity.

Might be time to pull on the bigboy pants and rip some code out of UVS. I had to do that to fix the “NiceIO” bug that was floating around for a while. I’m here sitting and hoping my project doesn’t get bogged down like this.

I have both these bugs and I’m being told to ‘hurry up’ while having to figure out whether I should really continue with Unity. And the learning curve for alternatives. Can anyone suggest a bug-free version of Unity that will function within reason for the year 2024? Help?

[image] kojagiri: I have both these bugs and I’m being told to ‘hurry up’ while having to figure out whether I should really continue with Unity. And the learning curve for alternatives. Can anyone suggest a bug-free version of Unity that will function within reason for the year 2024? Help? B…

[image] sandsalamand: Bug-free? It doesn’t exist. But in truth, there is no bug-free game engine out there. Maybe the second part - “that will function within reason” - can be fulfilled in 2024 at least then. At this time I need to spend 5 minutes at every compile, which is harrowing if I’m t…

[image] kojagiri: Can anyone suggest a bug-free version of Unity that will function within reason for the year 2024? Help? How comfortable are you with the idea of switching to C#? Because current evidence is suggesting that the team behind Unity Visual Scripting was part of the layoffs that …

[image] svenneve: This Ludiq background worker, I don’t know what it does that makes it choke, but apparently it requires more power than training an AI model, it’s so f-ing ridiculous than no matter how powerful a workstation I grab, this S*** tier visual scripting engine will just burn the CPU…

Is there any resolution for this. I’m sure we would be 4x more productive if Ludiq background worker did not took 15-30 sec for any small code change. I feel like waiting a lot after any C# code change. It’s frustrating.

Have you tried Assembly references? I found out it was recompiling all assets/resources. So I added some assembly references to various asset folders and it cut down from 30 seconds to about 5 for incremental compiles. By default, everything is in the same assembly, which obviously slows down compil…

There wasn’t even an API to monitor the process is done or not. If I want to use a loading screen to wait till it get down, I don’t even know how long I need to wait.

For the love of god, can the background worker get an option to be turned off.

Unity Engine

vertxxyz September 19, 2024, 11:50pm 13

If you don’t use visual scripting just remove it using the Package Manager.

Topic		Replies	Views
Is Unity's Visual Scripting any good in Unity 2021 LTS? Unity Engine Visual-Scripting , com_unity_visualscripting	22	4198	June 23, 2025
What is with all the default installed bloat in new Unity projects? (2022.3 LTS) Unity Engine Question	9	1148	August 31, 2023
Waiting for Unity's code in Unity.VisualScripting.Core.Editor.dll to finish executing Unity Engine Visual-Scripting , Question , com_unity_visualscripting	32	17180	June 19, 2024
Visual Scripting Product Feedback Unity Engine Visual-Scripting , Official , Feedback , com_unity_visualscripting	13	5516	January 30, 2023
Will Unity Visual Scripting receive any major updates in the future? Unity Engine Visual-Scripting , Advanced , Feedback , 6-5-alpha	33	618	March 22, 2026

For the love of god, can the background worker get an option to be turned off.

Related topics